PDA

View Full Version : Wonderlic Results from '09 Combine


Tió Nook Nook
04-21-2009, 09:51 PM
I know these are essentially useless, but it's kinda interesting to look at

http://www.profootballweekly.com/PFW/NFLDraft/Draft+Extras/2009/wwhi042109.htm

cheapshotartist
04-22-2009, 01:53 PM
I don't even check those scores, football is not rocket science. If you can play the game you can play the game! :csa:

yayarea_raider
04-22-2009, 02:41 PM
I don't even check those scores, football is not rocket science. If you can play the game you can play the game! :csa:

I disagree for QB's, although it says Marino and McNabb had low scores...so I guess your right.

cheapshotartist
04-22-2009, 05:31 PM
I disagree for QB's, although it says Marino and McNabb had low scores...so I guess your right.

Terry Bradshaw was supposed to be the village idiot but he led the Steeler's to four SB's. :csa:

yayarea_raider
04-22-2009, 05:54 PM
Terry Bradshaw was supposed to be the village idiot but he led the Steeler's to four SB's. :csa:

that POS had a defense to carry him though. A lot of ppl I talk to say Bradshaw was WAY overrated

or24
04-22-2009, 07:55 PM
How do these questions pertain to football? Is it to show how you perfom under pressure? lol

I dont think it means shit for any position...

Doesnt measure a qb's accuracy or decision making. Does answering a complicated question have anything to do with reading a defense??? You practice executing a play over and over until you have it down perfect and you learn what to do in every possible situation. Watch film to learn what defenses are going to try to throw at you.

If anything I would think the SECOND test shows something because it can show how you prepare and adapt. Idk overall its pretty pointless to me.

I guess it can show you if a guy is a complete dumbass and has a learning disability or extremely low IQ. Unless a guy pulls a vince young i would put no stock into it at all.

cheapshotartist
04-24-2009, 10:24 AM
How do these questions pertain to football? Is it to show how you perfom under pressure? lol

I dont think it means shit for any position...

Doesnt measure a qb's accuracy or decision making. Does answering a complicated question have anything to do with reading a defense??? You practice executing a play over and over until you have it down perfect and you learn what to do in every possible situation. Watch film to learn what defenses are going to try to throw at you.

If anything I would think the SECOND test shows something because it can show how you prepare and adapt. Idk overall its pretty pointless to me.

I guess it can show you if a guy is a complete dumbass and has a learning disability or extremely low IQ. Unless a guy pulls a vince young i would put no stock into it at all.

I agree we are talking about playing football. :csa:

silver & black
04-25-2009, 02:04 PM
Terry Bradshaw was supposed to be the village idiot but he led the Steeler's to four SB's. :csa:
Yup... and if there would have been a spot for him, he may have led the Raiders to 4 SB's.

silver & black
04-25-2009, 02:06 PM
that POS had a defense to carry him though. A lot of ppl I talk to say Bradshaw was WAY overrated

Right! I'd take that WAY overrated guy on my team ANY DAY. Bradshaw had a hell of a strong arm. He could make ANY throw needed. Anyone that says he was overrrated is just a fool... sorry.

TheMadEskimo
04-26-2009, 12:47 PM
The best scores I noticed at the combine.....

A.Q. Shipley Penn Stat 40/46

Kevin Barnes Maryland 41/50

iceman4444
04-26-2009, 01:49 PM
I know these are essentially useless, but it's kinda interesting to look at

http://www.profootballweekly.com/PFW/NFLDraft/Draft+Extras/2009/wwhi042109.htm

Only the NFL combines could come up with this crap. Alex Smith got one of the highest scores ever and he barely knew the plays.

I could care less about the wunderlink scores.